The definition of mHealth:

mHealth is the leverage of Mobile for Health

Mobile: the newest Mass Media
Health: The state of complete physical, mental and social well-being

NOTE: It is not a subset of eHealth, in the same way that the TV is not a subset of the Cinema. Mobile has 8 (already identified) unique attributes as the newest mass media and these can be leveraged to empower patients and Healthcare service delivery (click here to check out an example of each).

At least once a day I get asked “what is mHealth”. Despite me thinking it’s pretty simple, there seem to be a variety of different ideas on this which are illustrated perfectly by the rambling definition you’ll find at Wikipedia:

Mobile eHealth or mHealth broadly encompasses the use of mobile telecommunication and multimedia technologies as they are integrated within increasingly mobile and wireless health care delivery systems and is part of a movement towards citizen-centered health service delivery. Mobile technologies by nature lend themselves to more decentralized health service delivery. Although Ministries of Health in low and middle income countries and policy makers are eager to explore the use of mobile phones and other ICT to promote health, the lack of a comprehensive model, knowledge base, and published data on the health benefits poses significant barriers.

The most widely cited and definitive definition is by Istepanian et al. as ’emerging mobile communications and network technologies for healthcare.’

Other later citations include Bardram et al. as m-health is focused on embedded wireless devices that track health-related parameters:

“The recent advances in information and communication technologies (ICT) enable technically the continual monitoring of health-related parameters with wireless sensors, wherever the user happens to be. Small, low-power sensors can, in principle, be embedded in almost anything in our surroundings: furniture, vehicles, wearable devices, and even clothes. Mobile phones or personal digital assistants (PDAs) with wireless networking capabilities may serve as gateweays that process, store, and transfer measured parameters to clinicians for further analysis or diagnosis. This technology trend, also called mHealth (mobile health), is already visible in the market.”

To my mind these are invalid, Robert Istepanian’s (pictured above N.B. Please read comment from Prof Robert Istepanian posted in the comments below) definition cannot hold water because it suggests Mobile Communications and Network Technologies are “emerging” – after 30 years the newest Trillion $ industry is a long way from that, and the use of mobiles in Health are also familiar with 99% of users.

The talk of mHealth being about small wireless sensors and Body Area Networks (BANs) is something that all too often reflects the desires of technologists and researchers and has been “about to happen” since the days of PDA’s. But the Healthcare Industry has a long way to go before it even wakes up to the power of the mobile phone and network as a sensor:

and as a means of delivering valuable Healthcare Information:

…before we even start being able to understand the contributions these allied devices will make.

*** UPDATE: 18 June 2014 ***

Check out this 40 minute Introduction to mHealth presentation that I gave at the Digital Health Summit 2013 in Istanbul:

About 3G Doctor

The Corporate Blog of 3G Doctor
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

43 Responses to The definition of mHealth:

  1. Pingback: What is Mobile Health? « 3G Doctor Blog

    • Professor Robert S H Istepanian says:

      Hi,

      I am writing to clarify and also to repudiate the comments from the author on this blog on the m-health definition

      When I first defined m-health in my papers published in the IEEE Transaction Information Technologies in Biomedicine( That clearly the author did not read.). This was first in 1999(as unwired e-med) and then in 2003 ( as m-health). The ‘m-health’ wording and terminology used then was not known or used prior to that leading academic papers and publications and to that date to the best of my knowledge.
      The word concerning the ’emerging mobile and network technolgies’ in my original definition was to infer to then what was yet in the development phases and yet to be standarised and commercialised of the 3.5G and other beyond 3G technologies and networks ( not cellular) technolgies ( such as the current WiMAX) networks for use in healthcare applications. Where as by that date (in the late 1990’s and eary 2000’s) the phone technologies used commercially would have been of GMS/GPRS technologies that were not compatible to different m-health data applications that we see today.

      The author should have been aware of these facts and information before writing such comment(s) on this blog and should have read my papers first before posting any such misleading information.

      I request that the author to rectify and withdrew his comments on my definition on m-health.

      Thank you

      Robert S H Istepanian
      Professor
      Kingston University, London

      • Hi Robert,

        “I am writing to clarify and also to repudiate the comments from the author on this blog on the m-health definition”

        There is no untruth to my post. It is merely my opinion and I’ve linked to my source (Wikipedia).

        “When I first defined m-health in my papers published in the IEEE Transaction Information Technologies in Biomedicine( That clearly the author did not read.)”

        I have read and have copies of the vast majority of work in this area (including yours) although I can’t speak for the author of the wikipedia page. For readers here is the link to where Roberts published articles can be found: http://bit.ly/bVuNlj

        “This was first in 1999(as unwired e-med) and then in 2003 ( as m-health)”

        In the definition I gave above I specifically state that I think mHealth is not a “a subset of eHealth” (or “unwired e-med” as you prefer to refer to it).

        “beyond 3G technologies and networks ( not cellular) technolgies ( such as the current WiMAX) networks”

        Not sure what you mean by this. WiMax is most certainly a 3G technology according to the ITU: http://www.wirelessweek.com/Archives/2007/10/WiMAX-is-3G/

        “The author should have been aware of these facts and information before writing such comment(s) on this blog and should have read my papers first before posting any such misleading information”

        As stated above I have read and have copies of your papers, in fact I recall you giving them to me in 2005 after a meeting with your colleagues at Brunel University. In my article I have quoted (and linked to) your name/suggested statement taken directly from the Wikipedia entry for mHealth. If these are inaccurate please state this. If you would like me to edit the wikipedia entry for you I would be happy to oblige.

        “I request that the author to rectify and withdrew his comments on my definition on m-health”

        As the definition still remains on Wikipedia (a resource that is many many more times popular than my inconsequentially small blog) I think it’s only fair to quote it as that’s what most people would encounter first if searching for a definition on mHealth – which is what this blog is intended to address.

        In light of your interest in addressing this concern I have added a comment to the original post referring to these comments and your dispute.

        If I can be of further help please don’t hesitate to let me know.

        PS. writing PRIVATE CORRESPONDENCE on a comment here will have it acknowledged as such.

  2. Pingback: Select Committee on Aging adds to the confusion surrounding mHealth « 3G Doctor Blog

  3. Pingback: Intel Health’s Eric Dishman weighs in on the “hype and hope of mHealth” « 3G Doctor Blog

  4. Pingback: Is Healthcare facing a Wireless Health or a mHealth revolution? « 3G Doctor Blog

  5. Pingback: Telenor announce senior mHealth research focus « 3G Doctor Blog

  6. Pingback: Join the mHealth Summit Press Teleconference « 3G Doctor Blog

  7. Pingback: What is mHealth? « 3G Doctor Blog

  8. Pingback: Intel « 3G Doctor Blog

  9. Pingback: MobileStorm 2011 mHealth Report « 3G Doctor Blog

  10. Pingback: UKTI & DCKTN host mHealth Seminar at MWC « 3G Doctor Blog

  11. Pingback: “mHealth – Potentially Valuable, But Not Ready for Primetime” « 3G Doctor Blog

  12. Pingback: “mHealth What Really Works” « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  13. Pingback: Scientia Advisors: Defining mHealth « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  14. Pingback: Professional bodies representing Doctors need to take the lead with Mobile and the ROI is member engagement and being taken seriously « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  15. Pingback: There’s no app for saving a life… are you sure? « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  16. Pingback: Does “mHealth” really do more harm than good? « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  17. Pingback: How do I become a mHealth market leader? « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  18. Pingback: Telenor publishes “The socio-economic impact of mHealth” a report by the Boston Consulting Group « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  19. Pingback: Why mHealth isn’t “HealthCare Access Through Mobile Technology” « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  20. Pingback: Samsung launches “S Health” brand « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  21. Pingback: Why we’ll more likely to drop the “Health” than the “m” in mHealth « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  22. Pingback: Why we’re more likely to drop the “Health” than the “m” in mHealth « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  23. Pingback: Revolutionizing the Practice of Medicine « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  24. Pingback: PharmaPhorum: “Are mobile apps an opportunity for pharma? Not likely” « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  25. Pingback: Is there too much hype in the mHealth app world? « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  26. Pingback: mHealth talk by Healthcare Advertising Agency at the GSMA Mobile Asia Expo « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  27. Pingback: Is mHealth the leverage of the newest mass media for Health OR is it just a tool or a widget that’s just like any other technology? « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  28. Pingback: Is mHealth just a tool or a widget that’s just like any other technology? « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  29. Pingback: “Helping your patients make sense of the mHealth Marketplace” « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  30. Pingback: Who’s pushing back on the term “mHealth” and why? « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  31. Pingback: “Mobile Healthcare Strategy is critical because mobile is beginning to define the future of Healthcare” « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  32. Pingback: Bill Gates: the proliferation of mobile devices hasn’t yet revolutionized life in developing countries « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  33. Pingback: MoMo Dublin announce “Opportunities in M-Health” event (11 Feb 2013) « mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  34. Pingback: FierceHealthcare: mHealth is gaining prominence & mindshare in the “granddaddy” of all health IT shows | mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  35. Pingback: CNN’s “The Next List” to Profile mHealth Tech | mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  36. Pingback: Eric Topol rocks the Colbert Show with mHealth demos to introduce his book | mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  37. Pingback: Join us at the Digital Health Forum, Royal Society of Medicine, London | mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  38. Pingback: “Mobile Health: The technologies that are changing healthcare provision” | mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  39. Pingback: The National Institutes of Health launches a mHealth Online Training Course | mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  40. Pingback: Dr Eric Topol’s “The Patient Will See You Now: The Future of Medicine is in Your Hands” now available | mHealth Insight: the blog of 3G Doctor

  41. Pingback: e-santé, m-santé, quantified self, télémédecine ⇒ les définitions | Qualitiso

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s